{{ searchResult.published_at | date:'d MMMM yyyy' }}

Loading ...
Loading ...

Enter a search term such as “mobile analytics” or browse our content using the filters above.


That’s not only a poor Scrabble score but we also couldn’t find any results matching “”.
Check your spelling or try broadening your search.


Sorry about this, there is a problem with our search at the moment.
Please try again later.

Controversial blog seeding firm PayPerPost has backed out of its purchase of Performancing.com , just a week after announcing the deal.

The acquisition would have given the company an analytics platform to allow tracking of blog sites and its paid-for blog posts, as well as Performancing’s recruitment site, Performancing Exchange.

However, a short statement posted on the company’s blog said it had discovered the analytics solution “wasn’t a fit”:

“After much discussion and heartache we have decided to walk away from the Performancing deal. We listened to our Posties and other Metrics users, dug into the Metrics platform and regretfully found that it wasn't what we were looking for right now.”

The move has raised many eyebrows in the blogosphere, with many wondering about the effectiveness of Payperpost’s due diligence before it completed the deal.

It also comes as increased scrutiny is being placed on the transparency of the firm's paid-for blogging service. 

Michael Arrington, who regularly slams the company, took the opportunity to weigh in :

“Generally speaking, responsible companies “dig into” the acquisition target before they announce a deal.

“Whatever happened, this isn’t pretty. After the deal was announced, Performancing moved [its] non-acquired assets to a new domain name and re-launched that service.

“[It] certainly stopped talking to other potential acquirors, given that the deal was officially announced. In merger-land, this is what’s known as ‘being left at the altar’ because everyone down the road who you talk to will want to know why the previous deal exploded.”

Performancing.com’s Nick Wilson said the company would be taking its metric solution open source after the deal's collapse:

“After much discussion, we've decided that the deal proposed by PayPerPost just isnt right for us or our community. It's regrettable that we should part ways as I still feel that Dan and Ted are stand up guys breaking new ground, but in the end, the deal was just not right for them or us.”

PayPerPost’s blog added that anyone with a “robust analytics solution with consistently accurate data reporting” should drop it a line.


Published 5 January, 2007 by Richard Maven

529 more posts from this author

Comments (1)


erica sirjesse, self employed

The information you provide on payperpost is a great resource as you said. Another good resource that I have come across, when it comes to payperpost analytics, is a web site that was created a Jason Ryan Isaksen. Have you heard of this site, would it be allowed if I were to post a link to his web site here, or would that be breaking the rules? I think everyone here would benefit greatly from reading it. Have you ever heard of Jason Ryan Isaksen?


almost 10 years ago

Save or Cancel

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Daily Pulse newsletter. Each weekday, you ll receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.