Is paid content the online future of the newspaper business? While there's plenty of discussion and debate on the subject, if you listen to enough newspaper executives, you might come away with the impression that they think it has to be.

But while many newspapers contemplate paid content and talk up their plans, The Financial Times has actually been executing a paid content strategy.

As noted by paidContent:UK, in 2000, The Financial Times Group generated nearly three-quarters of its revenue from advertising in 2000. Last year, that number had been brought below 50%. And it's not done yet.

It has now added another property to its portfolio of online properties built on paid content. is a site covering the pension business, and like the other niche sites in the FT Group's stable, employs the same model: produce valuable content for lucrative, specialist markets, give non-subscribers a small taste of that content, and charge for full access.

Obviously, the FT Group is in a position many other publishers aren't. It has largely built its brand by serving professionals, namely those in the financial markets, and its brand and focus give it the ability to create new offerings in lucrative niches within the finance industry. Offerings, of course, that it can charge for.

But more important than the FT Group's market position is the fact that it has followed an approach that many others haven't: it decided that its content was worth paying for, decided to limit the amount it gives away for free, and actually executed on a plan to charge for content. Now with its model proven, it can scale out with relative ease, something that newspapers stuck in a painful form of business model purgatory simply can't do because their models, in many cases, still only exist on paper.

The lesson here, of course, is simple: being decisive counts for a lot. The Financial Times business model may not work for every newspaper company, but having a business model you can believe in is the first step in getting a publishing company on the right track.

Patricio Robles

Published 7 September, 2010 by Patricio Robles

Patricio Robles is a tech reporter at Econsultancy. Follow him on Twitter.

2642 more posts from this author

You might be interested in

Comments (3)


Rob Drummond

FT seem to have cornered the market somewhat in terms of providing specialised, valuable information - that many other financial news sites have struggled to achieve. I don't think - at the moment - that this model is really scalable for more mainstream news sites as the number of news alternatives increases.

almost 8 years ago


Simon Newsam

Good analysis. FT is unique in the UK but others have really strong brands and loyal readership in print eg The Sun, the Guardian etc. I expect we'll see them position themselves at every opportunity to strengthen their unique print content, their unique online content and their particular slant on the "news" that eeryone has so that a move to paid-for online content takes as many of their paper readers as possible.

almost 8 years ago


Christopher Rose

The FT may be managing to pull this off for now but I wonder how sustainable their model will prove to be as other companies or individuals start to offer competing services?

almost 8 years ago

Save or Cancel

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Digital Pulse newsletter. You will receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.