{{ searchResult.published_at | date:'d MMMM yyyy' }}

Loading ...
Loading ...

Enter a search term such as “mobile analytics” or browse our content using the filters above.


That’s not only a poor Scrabble score but we also couldn’t find any results matching “”.
Check your spelling or try broadening your search.


Sorry about this, there is a problem with our search at the moment.
Please try again later.

Digg logo Muhammad Saleem at The Mu Life wrote an article last week claiming that social media is more effective at disseminating news than Google News.

Muhammad’s article, ‘Why Socially Driven News is Better’ used the news of US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld’s resignation as an example of social media beating Google News to a major story.

Interesting argument, but it doesn't stand up...

Essentially, Muhammed's argument is that the story appeared on social media sites such as Digg, Netscape and Reddit before Google News picked it up (about 20 minutes later). Therefore he claims that social news is better, or at least faster.

But the article / methodology is wrong on a few points:

  • The screenshot for ‘Google News’ on MU Life is not in fact Google News! It shows the news results at the top of Google.com. Two things - 1) these links can't be sorted by 'Most Recent', and 2) news results shown on Google.com are most likely determined by popularity, which is never going to happen within 20 minutes.
  • Digg and Netscape didn’t 'break' the Rumsfeld news — they were simply the first to link to the Associated Press story.
  • Also, Google’s news crawler - ‘newsbot’ - doesn’t visit news pages every second, so how so how can it possibly be as fast as humans? Newsbot typically visits several times an hour to look for new stories.

Heather Hopkins at Hitwise has looked at the behaviour of users on these sites - check out her comparison of Digg and Google News.

Her analysis of clickstream data from the two sites suggests that Digg is more about video and games site than news. For instance, Heather’s stats show that One More Level, a games site, accounted for 16.83% of upstream visits to Digg.com last week, and that Digg accounts for a smaller share of visits to news websites than The Register.

Meanwhile, Danny Sullivan has an interesting case study which compares traffic sent to SearchEngineWatch’s blog from Digg and Google News. In this case, Google News won.

Further Reading:
How much traffic can Digg or Google News drive to your site?

Graham Charlton

Published 16 November, 2006 by Graham Charlton

Graham Charlton is the former Editor-in-Chief at Econsultancy. Follow him on Twitter or connect via Linkedin or Google+

2565 more posts from this author

Comments (2)


Ciaron Dunne, Director at www.broadbandgenie.co.uk

We run plenty of sites with B2B news. No doubt about it there, Google News is *much* more important at driving traffic. Perhaps not surprising.

almost 10 years ago



I like http://www.subbmitt.com It's a new social news site. Unlike digg, all articles make it to the front page. You can even submit an article or post a comment without signing up.

over 8 years ago

Save or Cancel

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Daily Pulse newsletter. Each weekday, you ll receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.