{{ searchResult.published_at | date:'d MMMM yyyy' }}

Loading ...
Loading ...

Enter a search term such as “mobile analytics” or browse our content using the filters above.

No_results

That’s not only a poor Scrabble score but we also couldn’t find any results matching “”.
Check your spelling or try broadening your search.

Logo_distressed

Sorry about this, there is a problem with our search at the moment.
Please try again later.

I have just had a very bad experience with a well known budget airline (Ryanair) and I haven’t even left home yet. 

It reinforced my view that I will only travel with that airline when I have no other practical choice.

So how come it is highly profitable?

The bad experience started when I had to try to decipher unreadable text just to access results from my flight search: 

I find these Captchas very awkward and usually try to avoid sites which insist on such measures, rather as I would not enter a bricks and mortar shop where a burly door keeper challenged me in a similarly threatening tone. (I do know that Econsultancy has to use them occasionally to avoid spam, but not every time I log in). 

As previously reported on this blog, the captcha security step is intended to make life difficult for screenscrapers. 

However, as is often the case with this airline, no-one else flies to the airport I wanted, so I had to suffer the captcha step. 

The next stage was OK and I selected a suitable flight but then the fun really began.

In order to avoid buying their insurance (I already have my own) I had to go into the insurance dialogue and click the ‘Please select a country of residence’ drop down, then scroll down until ‘Don’t cover me’ appeared, curiously between Latvia and Lithuania. 

And so it went on, with the system trying to bully or trick me into buying things I didn’t want before charging me a ridiculous amount for ‘web check-in’ (not quite as ridiculous as the amount for real check in) and credit card fees.

To add insult to injury, the web site ‘locked’ and I had to start again before eventually booking my flight.

It really was an unpleasant experience and reinforced my view that I will only travel with that airline when I have no other practical choice. So how come it is highly profitable?

Does that mean that the time and effort we spend as user experience consultants applying psychology to interface design doesn’t actually matter? I don’t think so. Even the web designers in this airline have applied behavioural insight but in their case it’s to cajole people into buying stuff.

I wonder if Ryanair is a special case. The boss of this company is notorious for capitalising on keeping their prices low (especially what appears to be their prices) but frankly I can see few other redeeming features. 

The service on their flights is notorious for being similarly stripped down to the minimum. And I believe staff also receive similar treatment (there was a newspaper report that suggested that they were not allowed to use company electricity to recharge their mobile phones!).

But would they be even more profitable if they paid more attention to their customer experience? Would the cost/benefit work out or have they a unique (but unattractive) business model? 

Does this have wider implications? What do you think?

Tom Stewart

Published 7 September, 2012 by Tom Stewart

Tom Stewart is Executive Chairman at System Concepts, and a guest blogger at Econsultancy. System Concepts can be followed on Twitter here, and Tom is also on Google+.

35 more posts from this author

Comments (35)

Comment
No-profile-pic
Save or Cancel
Graham Charlton

Graham Charlton, Editor in Chief at ClickZ Global

I think (and hope) Ryanair is a one off. You have to sort of admire O'Leary for his approach. Just this week he called his passengers 'idiots' http://bit.ly/NPcAJX

If any other airline could come close to the pricing and range of destinations, no-one would choose Ryanair, but people are desperate for cheap flights so, in this case, it does trump UX.

over 3 years ago

James Gurd

James Gurd, Owner at Digital JugglerSmall Business Multi-user

Hi Tom,

It's a good question.

I don't think there is a fixed answer - it depends on several things in relation to flights:

1) How important is price as the deciding factor for choosing an airline?
2) Is there any competition on the flight path you need to take?
3) How essential is flying to your work/life?

Taking myself as the example, I am price conscious but it's not the only deciding factor. It influences my decision - if I can save £30 then I'd naturally try to do that.

However, I also value customer service - friendliness, ease-of-use, comfort, convenience etc. My experiences of Ryanair and Easyjet are not that positive (frequent delays, rude staff - though only a minority, irritating checkouts that try to trick you into adding unnecessary fees etc).

Therefore, I actively try to fly with other carriers first. Only if I can't get a flight from another carrier or the price difference is so vast, do I reluctantly switch.

I have flown other budget airlines around the world and generally find the attitude of Ryanair's CEO to be the exception not the norm. He may be a successful businessman but his public persona is quite obnoxious and confrontational. I don't respect his attitude towards customers.

Where companies like Ryanair have it locked down is that competition on some flight routes is low, so if you have to fly, you don't have much choice. Their attitude to customer service would not work in highly competitive markets where choice is vast - take high street retail as an example. Can you imagine the likes of H&M treating customers like this publicly? People would soon walk to Zara, TopShop, NewLook etc.

Could they be more profitable? Impossible to answer without knowing the business model inside out. As soon as you add cost, you need to add revenue - so prices go up. If prices go up, it becomes easier to switch to non-budget. That means spending more on aggressive advertising/marketing to keep market share, which puts costs up again. The current economic conditions play into their hands - all the while disposable income is low, low-cost solutions will be jumped at.

What's your take?

Thanks
james

over 3 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Tim Leighton-Boyce, Analyst at CxFocus

Ryanair is a very extreme case. Broadening this out to more general ecommerce sites, I've seen evidence of a similar phenomenon.

Take a look at the abandon rates from checkouts, best of all look at the abandon rates from individual stages. You may find that the fluctuations correlate with the 'strength' of promotional offers and seasonal deadlines.

If the deal is super-good, or it's the last day for Christmas orders, pages which have known usability points of friction suddenly perform better. People are determined to complete the order.

Even better: if you work with voice of customer surveys you will probably be familiar with things like "I tried to buy this three times yesterday and couldn't. I had to come back today.

Of course business is still being lost. In the Ryanair example some people are avoiding the company if they have a choice. But what people say they will do and what they actually do can be different -- and 'cheap' is a strong motivator.

over 3 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

John Freeman

I think in the case of Ryanair, it may sound cliché but you get what you pay for. The reason they can afford to offer people these low prices is because they strip down on all other areas including customer service. I think if you choose to do business with them, which many people do including myself in the past you have to accept that eh trade off will be a poorer customer experience in general, both online and offline.

over 3 years ago

Gareth Jones

Gareth Jones, Chief Thinking Officer at Chemistry Group

Great post Tom and sorry to hear about your experience. Ultimately its all about choice. If customers had a range of providers to choose from on the routes that they wanted at the price they wanted, then RyanAir would have to smarten up its act for sure. His inspiration was Southwest Airlines but they have a far better reputation. At the moment he has a captive audience and a cost conscious one at that!

over 3 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Dave

User Experience costs money. It doesn't have to cost a lot, but it certainly costs some (even if it's just in the opportunity cost of refusing to use dark patterns). Given this, there's a tradeoff between getting the cheapest deal and getting a good experience.

Not all customers are the same - they are likely to put different values on that experience. And they exist on a spectrum - at one end of the scale are the business customers who want to spare no expense to make their regular flights as easy and comfortable as possible. On the other end, is the budget-conscious single mum trying to get the cheapest flights possible to take her kids on holiday.

What this means is that Ryanair is purposely targeting the budget-conscious end of the scale. There's no need for them to try to target the middle of the road, because that part of the market is already occupied by other airlines. The typical analogy here is icecream sellers at a beach - if all your competition is clustered around the middle of the beach, then it can pay to be all the way at the end. Ryanair would actually lose out by improving their experience, if it meant they had to put their prices up.

What we'd expect to see is a few companies doing this in each industry. We'd also expect to see the converse, with luxury brands charging a premium but providing a superlative experience. It's nothing to be worried about of course - if you want a better experience then don't fly with Ryanair. Market dynamics will mean there's a competitor which serves your particular balance of price and experience.

over 3 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Guy Mucklow, Senior Web Designer at PCA Predict (formerly Postcode Anywhere)

Interesting question Tom, and I would have to agree with the comments above and that it actually depends on a whole host of different measures. But I do think there is a lot Ryanair could do to improve usability for it visitors. Instead of making you select your country of residence from a drop down they could have simply find your location from your API, for example. There’s an interesting blog about how that can improve usability here: http://goo.gl/PtKBP

over 3 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Tim Leighton-Boyce, Analyst at CxFocus

Another aspect of this is the possibility that the 'attitude' of the web site is a persuasive tactic.

The look and feel of it may help to create an impression of cheapness when there could be better deals around. Retailers like Dixons used to do this on the high street, back in the day. And, if you're old enough to remember: Kwik Save.

A sense of urgency and momentum could also be encouraged by a feeling that the low price may go if you don't get on and jump over all these hurdles.

Same with the in-flight service and the pushing of add-on sales on board. It strengthens the notion that you're getting the cheapest deal, which is good for repeat business. You joke about it, or moan about it. But next time round, you're back on their site.

over 3 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Paul Keers

Ironically, there are so many consultants and advisors telling companies how to develop customer service, CRM, website usability etc - but how many are out there advising companies how they can follow the Ryanair model? And why not?

Because if you could run a business in another field which was as profitable as Ryanair, without all the costs and concerns of customer service, CRM etc - wouldn't you?

over 3 years ago

Graham Charlton

Graham Charlton, Editor in Chief at ClickZ Global

Interesting point Tim, and certainly makes sense. Perhaps this was part of the thinking behing the charging passengers to go to the toilet story? It had plenty of publicity a couple of years ago but, as far as I know, has never been brought in.

over 3 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Depesh Mandalia, Head of Digital Marketing at Lost My Name

The Ryan Air online experience is an extension of the brand. I accept there are some basics that could be better, but it seems they're intent on saving money everywhere and I imagine that includes not giving too much attention to user satisfaction since demand is sufficiently high.

I hear their web team contains a squirrel, badger and a hedgehog so its a miracle, and you should be thankful, that you can actually book online.

I agree with others it is an exception but there are other partially related examples; Have you tried browsing the Zara UK website lately? I imagine someone in Marketing thought it looked great, as a user I find it quite difficult to use.

How about Lings Cars? It has been covered numerous times about how good various aspects are such as the persuasion architecture however finding information can be nightmare.

I even have issues at times finding the right information on Amazon.

I believe customers will persist with all 3 sites for various reasons including price, range and availability

Ultimately competition increases standards in all aspects of life and includes websites and experiencs so until Ryan Air has enough competition for them to worry they'll continue not worrying much about their 'idiot' customers

over 3 years ago

Tom Stewart

Tom Stewart, Founder at System Concepts

Thanks for all your comments - I particularly like Tim's comment about the overall attitude of the airline and the 'in your face' low price (or at east the implication that it is low price). In fact by the time you add such luxuries as check in (?) and luggage, the price is far less competitive but we still think its a bargain. It reminds me of the bricks and mortar retailing trick of jumbling product in a large circular bin which makes us think it must discounted. But it's a depressing world if regarding your customers as idiots and treating them appropriately is a highly profitable business model!
I'd rather make less profit and work with customers I like ( a bit like we do in System Concepts!)

over 3 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Gerry Arcari

It matters a lot! I feel sorry for the tourist industry at the destinations they fly to because I, like many people I know, boycot these destinations because Ryanair is a totally unacceptable travel option. O'Leary is what gives business owners a bad name, and I hope he has his 'Ratners' moment!

over 3 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Thomas Frame

Flying might be the extreme end of this argument - unless you are flying first or business class in which case price is probably not that much of an issue, but flying is such a bad experience all round you might as well go for the cheapest and get it over with.

over 3 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Chris

Of course customer experience matters. For me amazon is my #1, why? There prices are competitive with everyone else but what really does it is the fact that their customer service is so good and I've never had a bad experience with them. Certainly keeps me coming back.

over 3 years ago

Nathan Raward

Nathan Raward, Head of User Experience at Looking for next role

Hi Tom,

I had a similar bad experience with Ryanair - when they refused to accept the boarding pass on my iPad at check-in, insisting that I needed a printed version - for which they charged me 120 euros!

Appreciate that it may have stated on the website that they needed hard copies (but why? - what do they actually do with that little tear-off strip on the boarding pass?) and how do they justify charging customers 60 euros to print each boarding pass?

I think they need to get with the (digital) program and align their services to meet the digital needs of their customers. If easyjet and the majority of other airlines can - why can't they?

I for one will never travel with Ryanair again.

over 3 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Neale Gilhooley

Michael FU O’Leary leaves many people furious, myself included, as without a small SM campaign and complaint articles in the Guardian & Scotsman we would have had to go to an Irish small claims court to get a cancelled flight refund. You have to hope that the world runs out of suckers as their flights are often not cheap once all the add-in and extras are charged. Ironically the service is not bad its just the experience before that is a nightmare.

No, they are not alone there is a hugely successful airline called AirAsia and they also have double speak when you try to cancel their default insurance, your press cancel then it asks if you want to cancel when you press cancel again you find you have cancelled your request not the policy itself BUT you don’t find out till 3 steps later when you are paying, and there is a booking timer running too. But why screw me over for £2?

over 3 years ago

John Waghorn

John Waghorn, Content Marketer at Koozai Ltd

A lot of people attack Ryanair for being a lower class airline, although some just want the cheapest option possible to get them to their chosen destination. This is one of the reasons as to why they are successful and you can’t argue that you don’t know what you’re getting with some airlines. Ultimately you pay for quality.

I think you have to strike a balance between setting a fair/competitive price within the market and also providing a decent level of customer service in person or via your website. If you find the best of both worlds then it should be enough for you to recommend the site and encourage repeat custom. Sometimes it’s easier just to say I’ll pay a bit more money in order to get a smoother transaction.

over 3 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Colin McDermott

I suspect that O'Leary must have had the box-set of Reggie Perrin's Grot Empire; watch out next for: "January sales in September. 20% ON everything. Fantastic increases all round."

hmmm ... now how do I work out this xxx EConsultancy CAPTCHA?

over 3 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Gareth Holt, Head of Technology at London & Partners

I think this is the telling sentence from Tom's post:

"Even the web designers in this airline have applied behavioural insight but in their case it’s to cajole people into buying stuff."

It's not that they haven't put effort into building the site, but the effort has been directed to make it deliberately confusing in order to get the highest possible revenue per booking.

It seems to be a commercially successful approach, so while you can hate to use the site, you can't really knock it.

over 3 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

,

If you don't like it, you should leave it alone. Nobody made you buy the ticket, did they? Mr O’Leary is only bothered about you handing over your card details and if you really don't like the (cut-price) service he provides, take your business elsewhere. Come on, grow up. Have you never heard of market forces?

over 3 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Anonymous

Working in UX, I actually find Ryanair's website incredibly interesting and admire the design of it greatly.

Gareth makes the point above, that all the design effort has been put to work in the opposite way from which one would usually approach buying journeys and checkout design. It's slow, it's tricky and it's deceptive. Of course they benefit from a lack of competitive choice a lot of the time but I don't believe for a second that the website has just ended up like it has because they haven't invested in UX.

If you're using it, I suggest just treat it as a challenge and enjoy it rather than getting annoyed that it's not what you expect.

over 3 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Andrew Allsop

Umair Haque recently posted a article titled "If You Were the Next Steve Jobs..." on HBR that provides an interesting perspective on this situation. He argues that problems such as scaling, efficiency, short-term profits and "growth" are all that are easily solved, and what better example than that of Ryanair.

Tomorrow's problems have a more intangible benefit. He defines them as:

Singularity - Scaling down an institution to make a difference to a human life.

Sociality - Giving your employees the ability to make their own decisions that build relationships with customers.

Spontaneity - the act of human potential unfurling in the moment — and if it's human potential you wish to ignite, then it's spontaneity you need to spark.

Synchronicity - it's time to drop the fourth wall of the "team" — and go beyond collaboration, to something like what Jung called synchronicity: a kind of uncanny intersection of seemingly unrelated lives.

Solubility - creating institutions capable of not just solving the same old problems, forever.

What Ryanair have done is gone for the lowest common denominator in every aspect of business and mastered them with crude simplicity. As a user of their service, and just by looking at their profits, you can't help but see the rationale behind their approach. But if businesses do begin to find solutions to Umair's concepts, they'll find themselves eating the dust of companies who began climbing further up the apple tree.

over 3 years ago

dan barker

dan barker, E-Business Consultant at Dan Barker

It all works very well for them. Even down to this blog post.

Richard Branson is keen on quoting how much 'free advertising' Virgin generate from stunts. I wonder how much free advertising Ryanair have created via the thousands of "Ryanair is bad!" articles, each of which has the counterintuitive effect of reinforcing their position as a cheap, zero frills (unless you pay for it) airline.

over 3 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Bill Brand

In the last week I have received diabolical customer service from Booking.com and Hillarys. Both were fine on the sales side and were selected on price, but once you had signed up the service was amongst the poorest I have every received.

Had I known the grief I would receive then I would not of gone with them, but the savings made at the start were too good to turn down.
I felt trapped by both of them.

I had to fly Ryanair last month and it was exactly what I expected. But for £40 (compared to BA’s £160) I knew I was getting what I paid for!

over 3 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

AKQUIKON Stephan Jäckel

Ryanair must be a huge topic in the UK given the many replies here. So you all fly Ryanair even if their fares aren't the cheapest, right?

Why? BA, flybe, Easyjet and the rest can't be that more expensive?

Or is it your mere perception that crappy cabin service, reports of airliners arriving almost without fuel at destination airports and weird approaches signal that Ryanair even saves on pilot training until the point where it does not get cheaper (i.e. cost of an accident)?.

The site is cheap, its crappy and it looks like the online-version of a mid 17th centruy arab bazar. And all its does is tell its people that only a really cheap and crappy airline will behave like that. Dan Garth (posting right above me) is so right when he notes that all in their communication is made to look crappy and cheap to the point of being unprofessionally designed.

If you look cheap you must be cheap. You try to sell to your customers as many extras as possible: Well you are so cheap you must be in need to do so, in order to survive.

I have never taken Ryanair and actually had promised myself never to do so but for some time now I have grown curious to try them at least once only to find out and feel myself that they have really optimized the image and their processes towards cheap, crappy and unbearable - the latter maybe only to sell some more on-board quirks.....

P.S.: I am probably the lousiest reader of Captchas like the one above. But even I would get that one right.

over 3 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Chris Moffatt

I would counter that you actually get exactly what you expect from Ryanair - they advertise themselves very clearly as a no frills airline and I found the booking experience to be exactly in line with that expectation. I didn't expect to be mollycoddled and treated with exultation when I was only paying £40 for my flight.

Would I have preferred a better online experience? Yes. But would it stop me from booking Ryanair again? No!

over 3 years ago

Tom Howlett

Tom Howlett, Digital Marketing Executive at Koozai

I think people are prepared to sacrifice bad customer experience to save money. Though this may prevent them from returning on a separate occasion to make another purchase.

Brands with great experience are much more likely to have greater brand loyalty I imagine.

The issue with Ryanair is that flights are generally pretty expensive, I think people are likely to bare the bad experience to save money. They are also likely aware that the bad experience may continue on the flight, but as long as it gets them to their destination they may not mind.

over 3 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Ryanairdontcare John Foley

Most understand the business model of Ryanair but passengers need to see how Ryanair exploit young people wishing to be cabin crew,charging 3000 euro to train to be Terminated as Ryanair's policey is RECRUITMENT for TERMINATION....These young terminated cabin crew which could be as high as 60% of new recruits,all paying large training fee, left abroad penniless with no flight home.Google Ryanairdontcare.

over 3 years ago

Andy Killworth

Andy Killworth, Digital Marketing Executive at Koozai

Ryanair deliberately courts 'controversy' - why? Because the public love it and lap it up. Any time a rumour or announcement pops up people on forums explode with discussion about how bad the company is, ad naseum.

The truth is, for the most part, people booking short-haul flights couldn't care less as long as the 'price is right'.

If I want a cheap, no-frills flight, do I really care what the CEO thinks of me? No, not at all - especially as he's just courting publicity.

Let's say I'm booking a domestic/internal flight, with a duration of perhaps an hour, tops. If the price is dirt-cheap (and often offers a huge time/hassle saving over the train), I really don't care what the 'customer experience' is. If I wanted ever-flowing free drinks or a decent meal I'd look elsewhere.

The issue regarding the fees/add-ons comes up time and time again (check out the MoneySavingExpert forums for copious amounts of threads relating to it). Yes, naturally the fees are there to increase profit - however you just need to pay attention during the booking/purchase process - not difficult.

Presumably people complaining about fees/bolt-ons would be much happier with bundled pricing and vastly increased flight costs for all, with punters who don't need luggage/insurance extras subsidising those that do?

over 3 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Hannah Norman, Digital Marketing Executive at Koozai Ltd

I think that despite the hurdles to jump over a good captcha never hurt anyone. When I get them, I get frustrated but I try to remember that the good Captchas are actually helping to digitise books!
http://www.google.com/recaptcha/learnmore

That usually quells any frustrations I have unless they are un-readable!

over 3 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

John Fahy

Hi Tom

Ryanair are a very successful company because they have a very clear strategy and implement it very well. The are very profitable precisely because (a) they find ways to extract as much income as they can from each passanger and (b) because their fares are not always as low as they would like people to believe they are. In the case of this company, a pleasant customer experience is and never has been on the menu! It gets in the way of maximum income for lowest costs. And their results prove it!

over 3 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

James Bolle

Brands need to understand why their customers are loyal to them and deliver it consistently. As an example, Ryanair is great at this - they promise safe flights, greater timeliness than other airlines and low prices. Anything above that, like customer experience, is a luxury and is expended with. Michael O’Leary’s “Mr Nasty” persona is the natural extension of this approach – it’s what economists call “signalling”: letting the buyer know exactly what to expect

The high barriers to entry in the airline game mean in many cases there is no alternative carrier. This can lead to a lot of angst, as Tom experienced. Fortunately retail and hospitality industries are not like this: price is rarely the only differentiator, and there are always people willing to pay a bit more for better service.

I believe that many more people suffer at the hands of the brands that create an expectation of better service and then execute badly than are affected by Ryanair delivering the low standards they promise. This is the scandal, and it’s what keeps me awake at night.

My life at Empathica is dedicated to helping brands understand what drives customer loyalty and then to figure out how to deliver it consistently. If everyone had Ryanair’s clarity of vision about their loyalty drivers, and ruthlessness in pursuing them, there would be a lot more profitable, successful companies out there.

over 3 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Sheila

I had to laugh, I had to use a Captcha to write this reply :-)

over 3 years ago

Tom Stewart

Tom Stewart, Founder at System Concepts

Sheila
I was going to let you have the last word after all the interesting comments (thanks everyone) but I saw this in the METRO on 3 October and thought Michael O'Leary probably deserved the last word. He is quoted as commenting on his £1m a year salary that 'I am paid about 20 times more than the average employee and I think the gap should be wider. I probably work 50 times harder'

over 3 years ago

Comment
No-profile-pic
Save or Cancel
Daily_pulse_signup_wide

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Daily Pulse newsletter. Each weekday, you ll receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.